"once more unto the breach, dear friends" is the sixteenth article to appear during the 1958-59 school year in the University of Notre Dame Scholastic humor column, "Escape".
- By Charles Bowen: Scholastic, Vol. 100, No. 17 - March 13, 1959, page 7.
Commentary
The column is mostly a satire on Organization Men (Whyte's book was big that year) and student politicians -- neither an especially original subject. I did feel that those who ran for office on the Notre Dame campus tended to go out of their way to demonstrate both humility and sincerity. Probably they had to; it seems to have been what the electorate demanded. And of course a person who harbors the ambition to be Student Body President isn't really likely to be extremely humble; if he was, he wouldn't consider himself fit for such a high office. And if he conceals his high opinion of himself, as he must in order to be elected, there goes sincerity as well. Hypocrisy becomes a requirement for office. In retrospect, I shouldn't have laid all the blame on the shoulders of the student politicos. They played the hand they were dealt.
Let's see. My description of John's imaginary triumph in Marshall needs no explanation, I trust.
The reference to the Alabama Club's Yankee Shoot was no doubt an attempt to get a rise out of my close friend and classmate, Wray Eckl, who came from Florence, AL (and now practices law in Atlanta).
The H.F.U. seal (a ranch wagon rampant on a field of gray dacron) employs some of the standard icons of fifties conformity, which intellectual college students like us all despised, in lockstep. "Creatively realize your life-potential" I think I found in some source where it was not intended to be funny.
In case the "Humoresque" tune is not familiar, you may have heard the version that begins "Passengers will please refrain/ From using toilets while the train/ Is standing in the station; I love you ..."
The plan for awarding scholarships is based on a Catholic concept known as the Treasury of Grace. It was invoked to explain how the church could attach indulgences to various practices. In our time, indulgences have not been handed out for cash; but it is perfectly true that that was being done in Martin Luther's Germany. However, Catholics were used to seeing, in a prayer book for example, a note after a prayer saying something like "Indulgence 300 days" -- meaning that you got an indulgence of that quantity every time you said the prayer. Because everyone knew that an indulgence was some kind of mitigation of the time you had to spend in Purgatory doing penance for the sins you had committed while alive, many people (including quite a few Catholics) interpreted this to mean that 300 days' indulgence meant that you had that many days knocked off your sentence. This was not the meaning, however: it meant that your time in Purgatory was lessened by the amount it would be lessened if you had, for example, spent 300 days going on a pilgrimage, in between all those sins. Your "sentence" was determined by the balance of good and bad deeds in your life, and this was an artificial way of adding to your balance of good deeds without actually doing them. Now, since the Catholic Church taught that your fate in the afterlife was, as a matter of Divine Justice, based on what you had earned for yourself by the way you had lived, how could they give away these free passes? I mean, it's nice to say prayers, but it's hardly the same as spending the better part of a year riding a donkey through the Pyrenees to visit St. James of Compostela. The Church even claims the right to attach "plenary indulgences" to some actions, meaning that the quantity of good deeds posted to the recipient's account is sufficient to remit the entirety of that person's debt of suffering. (Luther's followers satirized the sale of indulgences with a little rhyme that translates "As the money in the cashbox rings, the soul from Purgatory springs!") The explanation given was that there existed a "treasury of grace" consisting of the extra merit accumulated by the saints, many of whom had led lives of sufficient holiness and self-denial to earn heaven several times over. Rather than let all that goodness be as it were wasted, the Church claimed the right to dispense it to those of us who fall short of sainthood, in exchange for various pious acts such as saying certain prayers, or visiting churches at certain times, or (round about 1500) helping to pay for the construction of St. Peter's Basilica. Though I was indeed a Catholic at the time, I had considerable doubts about this doctrine; hence the spoof.
The only other thing worth annotating is the reference to Notre Dame's policy of turning off the lights in the corridors at night. The student government types were working earnestly at getting the administration to change its mind about this paternalism, but at the time without success. (When my younger brother went to Notre Dame in 1962, things had changed, but I never saw it.)
Judging by the conclusion, I must have felt that the efforts of the student politicians had as much chance of making things worse as of making them better [1].
References
- [1] Correspondence with Charles Bowen.
No comments:
Post a Comment